Results

Search news

  • Filter by area

  • Filter by type

  • Filter by category

Search publications

  • Filter by area

  • Filter by type

  • Filter by category

Press Release: UNFCCC Secretariat Dismisses Criticism of Coal Projects

Brussels, Tianjin. In a surprising move, the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has refused to forward a formal request by CDM Watch to the CDM Executive Board and its Methodologies Panel. The submission shows that current crediting rules for

Request to adjust the crediting rules for CDM coal projects

CDM Watch found that the crediting rules for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less GHG intensive technology (ACM0013) use outdated data to determine baseline emissions and ignore that the efficiency of new fossil fuel-fired power plants increases over time.

Request for Clarification of HFC-23 Crediting Methodology

On 13 September 2010, CDM Watch submitted a Clarification Request to provide clarity on current crediting rules for HFC-23 abatement projects. In addition to the evidence that was filed in March 2010 related to the gaming of the CDM by unscrupulous plant operators, this

Launch of CDM Toolkit (Newsletter #10)

Finally, CDM Watch is happy to present the second edition of the CDM Toolkit. The CDM Toolkit is designed for NGOs, activists and citizens who have little or no prior experience with the CDM. Like the first CDM Toolkit that was released by CDM

CDM Appeals Procedure (Newsletter #10)

Further to decision 2/CMP.5, the Board will discuss a first draft of procedures for appeals to challenge decisions by the CDM Executive Board at this week’s meeting. The inclusion of an appeals procedure in the CDM project approval process presents a crucial opportunity for

Additionality criteria back on the Board’s agenda (Newsletter #10)

The Board might again tackle the impossible task of improving project-by-project additionality testing during this week’s meeting. Numerous discussions in the past about the stringency of the additionality criteria in the so-called “first-of-its-kind” and “common practice” tests have not yet resulted in an agreement.

Scroll to top

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.