Close this search box.

Carbon Market Watch Newsletter – June 2019

EU governments breach citizens’ right to information on international aviation climate policy

Dear friends,

As I write this at the UN Climate Change Conference, Bonn, along with the rest of Western Europe, is sweltering in the scorching heat, an uncomfortable foretaste of what an ever-warming climate has in store for us. I can only hope that the UN climate negotiators also feel the heat and the urgency to act as they work on the Paris Agreement’s market provisions. It is crucial to agree on strong rules that ensure that all climate projects reduce emissions, involve local stakeholders into the decision-making, give affected communities access to a grievance mechanism, and place sustainable development at the heart of the projects. The Barro Barro hydro dam project in Panama is an example of a climate project that has failed on all these accounts – we cannot afford such mistakes in the future.

At the same time, signatories to the Aarhus Convention, a treaty giving citizens the right of access to information and justice in environmental issues, convene in Geneva. One of the issues to be discussed is how to promote the Aarhus principles in international forums, such as ICAO, the notoriously opaque UN aviation agency. Seven EU governments that sit in ICAO’s decision-making body are withholding information from their citizens while developing the aviation carbon market, in breach of their obligations under the Aarhus Convention.

Advocates for strong European climate action were in for a huge disappointment as EU leaders failed to commit to carbon neutrality by 2050 due to resistance from Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Estonia. These countries claim to be protecting their citizens and businesses against undue financial burden. We argue that Europe’s businesses (and citizens) are best protected when there are clear, political commitments to climate action that will translate into investment certainty. Finally, the European Commission urges EU governments to include concrete measures into their national energy and climate plans, largely confirming our recent analysis. Effective measures to cut emissions in the transport, buildings and agricultural sectors will bring tangible co-benefits such as clean air and better health.

Happy reading,
on behalf of the Carbon Market Watch team,

Kaisa Amaral
Communications Director

To Newsletter


Related posts

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.


2030 climate targets of over 50 top corporations significantly off track to keep within 1.5°C limit

At a time when global carbon emissions need to be almost halved by 2030, 51 major corporations’ climate commitments amount only to reducing their median carbon footprint by as little as 30%, reveals the 2024 Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor. Tighter regulations from governments are needed to raise the bar, both for companies which are taking insufficient action, and those who are not doing anything at all.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.