Direction of aviation’s market based mechanism still up in the air
“Thank God men cannot fly, and lay waste the sky as well as the earth.”
― Henry David Thoreau
Unfortunately for Thoreau, humans did conquer the skies, and aviation is now a significant contributor to climate change, contributing more CO2 to the atmosphere in 2014 than the combined emissions of the 129 lowest emitting countries[i]. Or just slightly less than oil giant Saudi Arabia.
In an eventual response, in 2013, the UN’s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) agreed to develop a CO2 standard in order to promote technological improvements, to explore the potential of biofuels and to develop a global market based measure (GMBM) starting in 2021 to offsets emissions that were above 2020 levels, but could not be reduced through the other two policy approaches. The majority of reductions will be made through the GMBM, offsetting aviation pollution through projects in other sectors.
2016 is the year that decisions on each of these are supposed to be made. ICAO has a number of committees, technical and political, that will be involved in the process until the Assembly makes its final decisions in October.
Carbon Market Watch has hope that discussions will lead to a cap on aviation emissions and the creation of a robust GMBM, which produces real emissions reductions. This is achieved by only allowing projects that reduce emissions that are additional to the status quo, permanent, verifiable, and completely and accurately quantified and monitored. Offsetting can only work if the projects (not just the programs of which they are a part) meet environmental criteria, ban harmful activities such as HFC-23 projects already banned in Europe and count reductions only one time.
Unfortunately, not much information is shared from ICAO’s technical and political meetings, making it difficult to ensure the discussion on quality criteria takes into account the rules necessary for an effective offsetting mechanism. If ICAO wants motivation to reach a strong decision, they can look to the many emissions trading systems (ETS) covering or planning to cover aviation emissions, including the EU, China and South Korea.
At the EU level, only domestic aviation is covered in the EU ETS. The EU temporarily exempted flights to non-EU destinations from the EU ETS until the end of 2016 waiting for ICAO to make a decision on international emissions – a measure called “stop the clock”. This means the EU will review its treatment of aviation emissions after the ICAO Assembly in October, which leaves little time to prepare an adequate response.
Fortunately, a few things can help prepare Europe’s response. The GMBM will not start until 2021, meaning the EU needs to continue covering emissions, including those to non-EU destinations, from 2017-2020. Additionally, ICAO’s goal is aspirational, meaning non-binding, so if Europe wants to stay on a 1.5 degree pathway the best way to maintain ambition is to keep aviation within the scope of the EU ETS, ideally with maximum amount of flights covered.
2016 will be a big year for aviation emissions. ICAO has much more to do to align its emissions reductions to the goal of limiting global temperature increases to below 1.5ºC, as the world’s governments agreed to do in the Paris climate Agreement, and Europe must be prepared with its response.
|Aviation GMBM 2016 timeline:
· In February, ICAO’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) will meet to make recommendations for the GMBM to the ICAO Council, including criteria for which offsets will be deemed eligible for use.
· In March, the GMBM Task Force (GMTF) will meet to make any changes to their recommendations in light of the outcome of the Paris climate agreement. The Council will also start to deliberate on what should be included in the Assembly Resolution adopting the GMBM.
· In March and April, the show will go on the road, with regional workshops convened in the Netherlands, Senegal, UAE, Mexico and Indonesia to engage local aviation and political stakeholders.
· In May, there will be a High Level Meeting where senior government officials will convene to input to the process. Their inputs should help the Council to refine the propositions it will submit for the Assembly’s approval.
· June gives the Council the opportunity to take the inputs from the committees throughout the year and to complete the process of drafting the draft Assembly Resolutions.
· The Assembly meeting will happen in October, when we will see whether ICAO and its member states have indeed agreed measures that will act to begin to curve the CO2 emissions from the sector.
[i] Calculation used the data from http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2014&sort=des9
7 Jul 2020
Shipping pollution should be covered by Europe’s carbon market – EU lawmakers
Watch This! - Civil Society Newsletter
30 Jun 2020
Dirty Cruise: Time to demand environmental action from shipping
30 Apr 2020