Submission to call for input: CDM Executive Board 69th Meeting Agenda

CDM Watch submission to the CDM EB 69th annotated agenda meeting with regard to items  on 1) Standardised Baselines, 2) Additionality, 3) Nitric Acid projects, 4) coal methodology ACM0013, 5) Sustainable Development co-benefits  in PoAs, 6) Improvement of local and global stakeholder consultations, 7) HFC-23 (clarification request on methodology)

Submission to call for input: On draft revision of the draft modalities and procedures for Joint Implementation

The insufficient current ambition levels also have led to a severe price decay in the carbon markets. At current price ranges, it is all but impossible to implement JI projects that are truly additional. Non-additional JI projects undermine mitigation goals, especially when they are implemented in countries with a large AAU surplus. A large supply of such ERUs will not only hamper climate goals but also severely undermine carbon markets.

Submission to call for input: On Sustainable Development and Co-Benefits

CDM Watch respectfully makes this submission in response to the CDM Executive Board’s (the Board) call for inputs on the design, substantive content and operational aspects of the draft development version of the sustainable development voluntary tool (SD tool), draft SD tool report and SD tool user manual.

Submission to call for input: CDM Executive Board 68th Meeting Agenda

Joint CDM Watch and Sierra Club submission to the CDM EB 68th annotated agenda meeting with regard to prevailing concerns in the revised ACM0013 “consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less GHG intensive technology”

Submission to call for input: On the draft revised methodology ACM0013

Call for input on the draft revised methodology ACM0013 “Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less GHG intensive technology — Version 4.0.0”. We welcome the opportunity to comment on the draft revision of ACM0013. We asked the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) to carefully examine the …