Rather than the feared depression in trade flows, the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) looks set to become a powerful climate diplomacy tool that will encourage Asian economies to clean up their industries, a new simulation finds.
In the heated debate on exports that risks undermining the very foundation of the CBAM, one question remains unanswered: for how long can EU policymakers shield heavily polluting productions from paying the fair price for their emissions?
After receiving billions in state aid and free pollution subsidies to decarbonise its production, steel producer ArcerlorMittal put its clean steel projects on hold.
There is an increasing need for both public and private expenditure, and an availability of growing ETS revenues. Those delivering the most climate action must be rewarded.
Our latest FAQ has the answers to everything you always wanted to know about the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.
Our latest FAQ has the answers to everything you always wanted to know about the EU Emissions Trading System revenues
The recent drop in prices on the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) threatens to slow industrial decarbonisation and to deprive state treasures of urgently needed funds for climate action.
The EU Emissions Trading System is a cornerstone of the European Union’s climate policies, yet it is poorly understood. Here, we answer some frequently asked questions about the EU ETS.
A large part of heavy industry carbon emissions is exempted from ETS obligations. The allocation system of free emissions allowances was designed to shield European heavy industries from the purported risk of “carbon leakage”, the alleged risk that industries will relocate their production outside of the EU to countries or regions with more lenient carbon emission policies.
Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.
