Close this search box.

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism must replace EU carbon market freebies

The European Union must hold firm and act now to live up to its commitment to future generations by taking concrete steps to phase out free pollution permits under its Emissions Trading System, writes Laurence Lamy, head of EU Affairs at Cem’in’EU.

Image: Note Thanun, Unsplash 

The European Union is at a crossroads in its climate ambition. The coming confirmation votes of the European Parliament will either pave the way for a more sustainable Europe or signal that the bloc is unwilling to meet the climate challenge for future generations.

Among the many initiatives on which the European Parliament will have to confirm its virtuous approach, the creation of an ambitious Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) linked to an efficient and justified review of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) represent a game changer for a passive EU industry.

As an industrial start-up, Cem’In’EU strongly believes that industry has a shared responsibility for delivering on this vision. Policymakers must create a framework to enable innovation and sustainability to thrive, while industry has to seize the opportunities this provides to implement processes with the best possible environmental footprint. Contrary to the traditional resistance of cement players, the new generation of cement factories is committed and innovates to reduce its emissions.

While political groups in the European Parliament are divided about the issue of ETS free allowances, a choice, for the advent of a modern and sustainable EU industry, must be made in Strasbourg, at the plenary vote on 7 June.

Perverse incentives

The free allowances under the ETS are not sustainable and must be gone by the end of the decade. The existence of these free allowances doesn’t comply with the ‘polluter pays’ principle, a core European value. Moreover, this system has not changed behaviour. On the contrary, it has subsidised, for years, polluting practices in disguise. Worse, during the third phase of the ETS (between 2013 and 2019), gross CO2 emissions from the EU’s cement industry increased from 103 million tonnes to 108 million tonnes.

In addition to this dismal reality, the free allocation of emission permits for the cement industry during phases 1 to 3 of the ETS, and especially after the 2008 global recession, subsidised years of pollution. The European cement industry reaped about €3.5 billion of “over allocation” profits due to a slowdown in production during which allowances were unchanged.

Those billions were not reinvested by the cement players into Best Available Techniques (BAT) in their European facilities but used to develop brand new and BAT cement plants outside Europe. In 2019, there was only 48% dry kilns with carbon-reducing preheater and precalciner in the EU-28, against 93% in India or 78% in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia together. This dual behavior from the same players is because they had no incentive to reduce their CO2 emissions in Europe.

While the EU wants to be the most virtuous and encourage global partners to follow the path of sustainability and hope to safeguard a promising future, the European cement industry is a poor performer worldwide. Taking this into account, how can we consider further delaying the full implementation of a powerful carbon leakage tool, such as CBAM, in order to maintain these ETS free allowances with their perverse effects?

Free allocation must end

The Fit for 55 package, of which CBAM is an essential component, is designed to deliver at least 55% emissions cuts by 2030. In practical terms, this means the full implementation of CBAM by the end of the decade, together with a corresponding full phase-out of ETS free emissions allowances. Waiting another 10 years, because some sectors, such as cement, delayed their action to be more sustainable is simply not acceptable. The EU must hold firm and act now to live up to its commitment to future generations.

The current version of the CBAM and ETS reports agreed by members of the Environment Committee represents a very positive signal for EU industry and a clear pathway to hold it to its environmental

If an industrial start-up like Cem’In’EU is ready to operate within a brand new framework, without free allowances, but with a border levy (CBAM) ensuring a level playing field between EU players and external partners, other traditional cement companies must have the resources to do so. Let everyone take responsibility at this decisive moment.


The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those of Carbon Market Watch.


Related posts

Doing accounts

The EU’s double counting problem

Motivated by a desire to keep down the cost of achieving its climate targets, the EU has failed to rule out the double counting of emissions reductions under its Carbon Removals Certification Framework. By so doing it is undermining established standards and its own policies.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.