Close this search box.

SOS: Save Our 2050 strategies

To keep global temperature increases to 1.5°C, to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, will require us all to do all we can to decarbonize as quickly as we are capable. Having national plans in place that focus on near-term action in the context of longer term decarbonization and climate resilience will help to avoid locking in high carbon infrastructure and address climate vulnerabilities in a strategic manner.

Written by Katherine Watts, International Climate Policy Advisor at Carbon Market Watch. Article published in issue #7 of ECO – the COP 21 NGO daily Newsletter 

In Cancun, Parties agreed that they would develop low carbon development strategies, and this implementation tool is one that is again being promoted. These plans must be durable element of the Paris outcome (somehow they ended up in the decisions) and therefore need to be reflected in the core agreement. Of course developing countries must be provided with support to develop and implement their strategies.

In these nationally-appropriate strategies, countries should lay out a trajectory for decarbonization by 2050, with indicative targets for 2030 and 2040. Details of the policies and measures to achieve low carbon and climate resilient development for the next 5 years, to be aligned with the cycles in the UNFCCC is key.

Earlier this year the sustainable development goals were agreed too and will also need to be implemented. This is a major opportunity for all countries to develop their sustainable development and zero carbon development plans holistically. SDG goals for energy, infrastructure and forests etc clearly are mitigation relevant. Similarly goals for water, agriculture and health are important for climate resilience.

Focusing on national implementation will also ensure that the plans are appropriate for each country’s special circumstances, and can also involve ministries that have not yet engaged on climate.

They can also give the confidence that all countries are acting together.



Related posts

Pricing the priceless: Lessons for biodiversity credits from carbon markets

Biodiversity markets are meant to channel private sector funding towards schemes that aim to conserve and restore biodiversity. In its current form, the unregulated funding schemes are reminiscent of the voluntary carbon market, which has a track record of supplying poor quality, cheap credits that inadequately transfer funds to the Global South. 

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.