The European Commission’s methodologies to certify carbon farming activities in the EU are now worse than the original draft presented back in 2024. The EU must not allow this to pass.
EU draft rules to certify carbon sequestration and emissions reductions fall short of the scientific demands outlined in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, new analysis shows. EU policymakers must significantly improve them before formal adoption.
Everybody loves a good design. As the EU prepares national targets for 2040, we will see whether they are designed for real-world climate impact – or just for a clean look hiding messy emissions. In our fresh-off-the-press position paper, Carbon Market Watch sets out what the European Commission needs to keep in mind when designing …
Read more “Position paper: removals in the EU’s post-2030 climate architecture”
Carbon Market Watch analysed the climate strategies and underlying assessments of six European countries – Austria, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, and Norway – and the European Commission. Across the board, an alarming pattern consistently emerges: a heavy reliance on carbon dioxide removals (CDR) to achieve climate targets. Moreover, this dependence is resting on shaky ground due to a consistent failure to carry out critical feasibility assessments.
Oil and gas interests pollute the carbon crediting rulebook and invest heavily in a marketplace flush with low-quality carbon credits. A new Carbon Market Watch report demonstrates how some of the world’s biggest fossil fuel companies use their oversized leverage to influence major decision-making bodies in the voluntary carbon market.
At today’s Carbon Removals Expert Group, Carbon Market Watch and allies from EEB, ECOS and Bellona highlighted the unsuitability of proposed carbon farming methodologies.
The newly released Greenhouse Gas Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard (LSRS) establishes a critical framework for companies to account for land-based emissions and carbon removals, addressing long-standing gaps in corporate climate disclosure. However, the standard’s potential to drive genuine decarbonisation and accurately account for emissions and removals is compromised by two structural ambiguities.
Good climate planning is the foundation of effective climate action. But right now, EU Member States’ National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) are falling short, lacking transparency and proper assessments of how permanent carbon dioxide removals (CDR) will actually be deployed to help achieve net zero emissions. The most popular CDR technologies come with real …
CRCF is currently viewed as only a small cog in the EU climate policy machine, but it plays a crucial function as a fundamental facet of any policy related to permanent removals, the land sink or agricultural emissions.
Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.
