Close this search box.

Watch This! NGO Voices on Carbon Markets #10 October 2014


Dear friends,

This WatchThis! edition takes a critical look at the upcoming climate change conference in Peru: Plates of negotiators will hopefully not only be filled with delicious Ceviche but also with a healthy portion of climate finance that will be crucial for a constructive dialogue to agree on rules needed to lay the essential groundwork for a future climate treaty to be agreed in Paris in 2015.

We remind about lessons learnt from the CDM Policy Dialogue back in 2012 and explain why it is critical that civil society is actively involved in discussions about the shape of new market mechanisms. We also look at why the CDM in its current form cannot be eligible for accessing climate finance under the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and how the important mandate to protect human rights in climate change related matters can be operationalized.

This edition also looks at the challenges and opportunities of the post-2015 global development framework which will replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) at the end of 2015.

Finally, our Guatemalan friends provide a first-hand account about how the infamous Santa Rita hydroelectric dam is becoming a showcase of the power of civil society despite the struggle faced by the indigenous Q’eqchi´ and Poqomchí communities.

Happy Reading!


Related posts


EU ETS key policy and advocacy milestones

This timeline of future EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) policy milestones is useful for civil society organisations and activists to identify moments for advocacy activities.


2030 climate targets of over 50 top corporations significantly off track to keep within 1.5°C limit

At a time when global carbon emissions need to be almost halved by 2030, 51 major corporations’ climate commitments amount only to reducing their median carbon footprint by as little as 30%, reveals the 2024 Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor. Tighter regulations from governments are needed to raise the bar, both for companies which are taking insufficient action, and those who are not doing anything at all.

Doing accounts

The EU’s double counting problem

Motivated by a desire to keep down the cost of achieving its climate targets, the EU has failed to rule out the double counting of emissions reductions under its Carbon Removals Certification Framework. By so doing it is undermining established standards and its own policies.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.