Close this search box.

Carbon Market Watch Newsletter – April 2017


Negotiations on how to implement the Paris Agreement will continue at the UN climate conference in Bonn this May. Ahead of the meeting, the European Commission has released a study showing manifold problems in the offsets generated under the Clean Development Mechanism. The study underlines the urgent need to stop using offsetting as a climate policy.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF), which aims to support a paradigm shift in developing countries by channelling financial support to climate change mitigation and adaptation, has also been a talking point this month. Despite vocal opposition by green groups, the GCF Board recently approved funding for three large hydro projects. These project types have in the past been plagued by multiple problems from human rights violations to environmental harm.

This month Carbon Market Watch participated in the spring meetings of IMF and World Bank in Washington D.C. where discussions on the advancement of carbon pricing gathered pace. We also co-hosted a workshop in Madrid along with 25 NGOs from Southern Europe to discuss how civil society collaboration on climate advocacy at local, national and European levels can be enhanced. Guest author Susana Pinto from Portugal shares with us the highlights of the event.

Happy Reading
Carbon Market Watch


Related posts

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.