Close this search box.

NEWS: European lenders put pressure for Barro Blanco to go ahead

barro blanco womanBarro Blanco – a CDM approved hydro dam in Panama – has entered in its most critical phase, following back pedaling from the government of Panama and threats by European lenders. Indigenous people set a deadline for the project to be cancelled.

Following Panama’s landmark decision in February to temporarily suspend the construction of the Barro Blanco hydroelectric dam – a project registered under the UN’s CDM carbon offsetting mechanism, a dialogue roundtable was set up, between the Panamanian State and local communities, to discuss the compatibility of the dam with national laws and human rights.

Faced with the indigenous demand to cancel the project, the government finally acknowledged “recurring administrative flaws and improper handling” by the company in charge, GENISA, and decided to dismiss it at the beginning of May. It also offered to carry on the discussions to analyze how the project can continue “in accordance with the well-being of the communities”.

Two weeks later however, the government completely changed its position: it considered that the “continuation of the project is a matter of national interest” and that GENISA will keep being in charge! Indigenous communities decided to walk out of the dialogue process and set a final deadline: the project should be cancelled by the 15th of June.

What happened? Part of the answer lies in the fact that European development banks have put an incredible pressure on Panama. Following the suspension of the project, they sent a letter with clear threats. They expressed “great concern and consternation” on the temporary suspension of Barro Blanco and feared that “actions such as the one taken against GENISA may weigh upon future investment decisions and harm the flow of long term investments into Panama”.

Barro Blanco has now entered in its most critical phase, according to a representative of the UN. By defending so hard the project, despite its violation of international laws, European Development Banks send an outrageous message: European public money supports human right violations. As those banks are under supervision of national states, we call the Dutch and the German government to take over the file and to withdraw from the financing of Barro Blanco.

More than ever, it is essential that project-affected peoples have the right to seek recourse when CDM project activities cause harm to communities and the environment, at any point during the project cycle. We call for a robust grievance mechanisms both, at international as well as national and local level.

In Brief – MEPs call CDM Board to investigate on Santa Rita

Following Carbon Market Watch event on climate finance accountability at the European Parliament, 4 Members sent a letter to the CDM Board expressing their “serious concern” about the CDM registered Santa Rita Hydroelectric Plant in Guatemala. They call on the CDM board to initiate it own investigation and to accelerate the establishment for a CDM grievance mechanism.

You can read a statement and the letter on the website of MEP Heidi Hautala.

the news signiture


Related posts

Pricing the priceless: Lessons for biodiversity credits from carbon markets

Biodiversity markets are meant to channel private sector funding towards schemes that aim to conserve and restore biodiversity. In its current form, the unregulated funding schemes are reminiscent of the voluntary carbon market, which has a track record of supplying poor quality, cheap credits that inadequately transfer funds to the Global South. 

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.