Policy Brief: A New Look at Loopholes

Anja Kollmuss, CDM Watch December 2011

Introduction

To date, 42 developed countries (Annex 1) have submitted pledges. Fulfilment of the developed country pledges is projected to reduce emissions by up to 4 billion tons (Gt) CO2e in 2020 from “business as usual” (UNEP 2010). This is about one third of the estimated 12 GtCO2e of emissions reductions that would be needed to remain on a path consistent with keeping warming below 2°C (UNEP 2011). Unfortunately, weaknesses in international emissions accounting could substantially weaken these already insufficient pledges, negating much if not all of their intended emissions benefits. In this paper, we address the following five “loopholes” in the existing negotiation framework, examine their impact, and list possible policy solutions to close them:

  • Hot Air – surplus allowances (AAUs) from the first commitment period.
  • LULUCF weak accounting rules
  • CDM credits that do not represent real emissions reductions.
  • Double counting of emissions reductions
  • Emissions from International aviation and shipping

In this analysis, we compare  the cumulative emissions reduction that could be achieved by the current pledges with the cumulative size of the loopholes. We translated the pledges into a commitment  period from 2013 to 2020, the year used in the submitted pledges. Under such an 8 year commitment period the current pledges of 42 Annex 1 (A1) countries translate to approximately 18 Gt of cumulative emissions reductions by 2020. Table 1 and Figure 1 show the estimated cumulative size of the loopholes by 2020.

Author

Related posts

Taylor Swift and private jet

Taylor Swift and the top polluters department

Taylor Swift claims she can offset the immense carbon footprint of her private jet but the only way for high-flying celebrities and the superrich to reduce their climate impact is to fly less and choose more sustainable forms of transport.

COP28: Article 6 failure avoids a worse outcome 

Torn between countries demanding that Article 6 carbon markets be available with virtually no restrictions and countries insisting on upholding transparency, human rights, and climate ambition, negotiators at COP28 failed to break the deadlock. With all the unresolved problematic issues, the fact that they reached no deal was better than agreeing to a bad one that would torpedo the Paris Agreement.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.