CDM Watch’s comment on Meth Panel Note on AM0001

Download pdf here


HFC-23 is an unwanted byproduct from the production of HCFC-22, a refrigerant gas that is currently subject to a phase-out under the Montreal Protocol due to its ozone-depleting properties. As a greenhouse gas, HFC-23 is 11,700 times more potent than CO2 and has an atmospheric lifetime of 250 years.

The CDM issues carbon credits for the destruction of HFC-23 gases to prevent their release into the atmosphere. There are currently 19 HFC-23 abatement projects registered under the CDM. These 19 projects are projected to deliver more than 476 million carbon credits by 2012. Over half of these credits (288 million) have already been issued, representing about 50% of the credits from all CDM projects issued to date.

Analysis of monitoring data from all registered HFC-23 destruction projects revealed that CDM HCFC-22 plants are intentionally operated in a manner to maximize the production of offset credits. The analysis indicates that because of the extra CDM revenue more HCFC-22 is produced and far more HFC-23 generated than would occur without the CDM. Following the official request by CDM Watch to revise AM0001 and an investigation by the UNFCCC methodology panel which confirmed that the methodology had major loopholes, the CDM Executive Board suspended the HFC-23 methodology in 2010.

At their 49th meeting, the UNFCCC methodology panel presented a new version of the methodology AM0001 which will be discussed at the next meeting of the CDM Executive Board starting on 30 May 2011.

The text (to be downloaded above) lays out the main issues that remain with this project type, despite the improvements that have been made in the revisions.


Related posts

Carbon Market Watch welcomes EU ban on “carbon neutrality” greenwashing

Companies selling in the European Union will no longer be able to claim that their products are carbon or climate neutral, the EU has provisionally agreed. This victory against greenwashing corresponds to longstanding demands from climate campaigners to eliminate the use of offsets and send a signal to the voluntary carbon market.

Integrity Council’s rulebook sets minimum threshold instead of high bar for carbon markets

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s latest guidelines provide a set of much-needed incremental improvements but fail to raise the quality of carbon credits sufficiently and leave too much wiggle room to truly tackle the climate crisis. The ICVCM has the opportunity to clear up the loopholes and ambiguities when it issues its first assessments of carbon market programmes.

CDM Watch’s comment on Meth Panel Note on AM0001

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.