Search
Close this search box.

Clarity regarding HFC-23 issuance for current Crediting Periods on the Horizon (Newsletter #12)

In addition to the evidence that was filed in March 2010 related to the gaming of the CDM by unscrupulous plant operators, CDM Watch has submitted a request to clarify current crediting rules for HFC-23 abatement projects. This new submission AM_CLA_0191 seeks to clarify how the waste generation rate should be calculated for HCFC-22 production plants where key components have been replaced or retrofitted. The introduction of more efficient production techniques would logically lead to the reduction of the baseline waste generation rate but the wording of the methodology is unclear on this point. The request was first discussed at the Methodologies Panel meeting from 25-29 October 2010. However, the Meth Panel failed to adopt a specific recommendation to the Board.

Action to be taken by the Board:

As the methodology AM0001 is on hold and being revised in the coming months, Board members should urge the Meth Panel to come forward with a clear recommendation including the concerns highlighted in the clarification request. However, while a revised methodology will only apply to new crediting periods, such a clarification would already impact the current crediting period. The introduction of more efficient production techniques could lead to fewer emissions compared to the baseline. However, this possibility is not currently reflected in the baseline, which is leading to excess issuance of credits. At a time when the integrity of the CDM is being called into question for a number of reasons, the Board should make immediate changes where possible to safeguard environmental integrity.

Author

Related posts

Pricing the priceless: Lessons for biodiversity credits from carbon markets

Biodiversity markets are meant to channel private sector funding towards schemes that aim to conserve and restore biodiversity. In its current form, the unregulated funding schemes are reminiscent of the voluntary carbon market, which has a track record of supplying poor quality, cheap credits that inadequately transfer funds to the Global South. 

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.