EU Action on CDM (Newsletter #11)

Alarm about the environmental integrity of industrial gas abatement projects under the CDM has reached the highest political level in Europe. In response to mounting concern about HFC-23 and N2O projects, EU Commissioner for Climate Action, Connie Hedegaard, announced in August 2010 that the European Commission would draft a proposal on quality restrictions on the use of CERs from industrial gas projects in the EU ETS and present them at the UN Climate Change Conference in Cancún in December.

EU Member State experts were expected to vote on the text at a meeting in mid-November. However, multiple delays in the internal consultation process likely linked to behind-the-scenes lobbying by industry representatives have cast doubt over the feasibility of this, raising concerns about the fate of the proposal.

The CDM Watch submission to the European Commission’s consultation on offset quality restrictions in the EU ETS calls for an outright ban on credits from HFC-23 and N2O from adipic acid production. This ban should apply to all CERs that were generated after a cut-off date that should be set no later than 1 January 2013 and should also strictly prohibit holders of HFC-23 and adipic acid CERs to bank these credits for use in Phase III of the EU ETS.

In addition to the analysis on HFC-23 projects summarized in our revision request, the Stockholm Environment Institute recently published two studies on N2O from adipic acid and N2O from nitric acid. A comprehensive overview of the problems associated with HFC-23 and adipic acid projects is provided in our Q&A on industrial gases.


Related posts

Carbon Market Watch welcomes EU ban on “carbon neutrality” greenwashing

Companies selling in the European Union will no longer be able to claim that their products are carbon or climate neutral, the EU has provisionally agreed. This victory against greenwashing corresponds to longstanding demands from climate campaigners to eliminate the use of offsets and send a signal to the voluntary carbon market.

Integrity Council’s rulebook sets minimum threshold instead of high bar for carbon markets

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s latest guidelines provide a set of much-needed incremental improvements but fail to raise the quality of carbon credits sufficiently and leave too much wiggle room to truly tackle the climate crisis. The ICVCM has the opportunity to clear up the loopholes and ambiguities when it issues its first assessments of carbon market programmes.

EU Action on CDM (Newsletter #11)

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.