The HFC-23 destruction scandal – The Ulsan Project (Newsletter #10)

Further to serious concerns that were highlighted with regard to the methodology for HFC-23 destruction, the Board will discuss  the first renewal request to renew the crediting period for a HFC-23 destruction project. The HFC-23 Decomposition Project in  Ulsan, South Korea, operated by the Ineos Group (Project 003) generated 1.4m credits over the first crediting period (2003-2010)  and is applying for another 2.2m credits from 2010 to 2017.

However, an analysis of monitoring data shows that the Ulsan project has also artificially increased HCFC-22 production. The figure on the left  illustrates that from 2001 to 2005 the Ulsan project produced HCFC-22 in the range of about 1000 – 4000 kt/year. When submitting the project for CDM registration, the plant operators declared that they would produce about 4111 kt/yr. However, after the registration of the CDM project in 2005, annual HCFC-22 production increased to about 7000 kt/year.

Action to be taken by the Board: In light of the serious concerns that the methodology for HFC-23 destruction incentivises project developers to artificially increase their production, CDM Watch believes that a decision about the renewal of the crediting period can only be taken once the significant concerns about the current methodology have been addressed. The Board must put the request for renewal of the crediting period of this project on hold until the results of the investigation have been presented and a revised methodology adopted.


Related posts

Carbon Market Watch welcomes EU ban on “carbon neutrality” greenwashing

Companies selling in the European Union will no longer be able to claim that their products are carbon or climate neutral, the EU has provisionally agreed. This victory against greenwashing corresponds to longstanding demands from climate campaigners to eliminate the use of offsets and send a signal to the voluntary carbon market.

Integrity Council’s rulebook sets minimum threshold instead of high bar for carbon markets

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s latest guidelines provide a set of much-needed incremental improvements but fail to raise the quality of carbon credits sufficiently and leave too much wiggle room to truly tackle the climate crisis. The ICVCM has the opportunity to clear up the loopholes and ambiguities when it issues its first assessments of carbon market programmes.

The HFC-23 destruction scandal – The Ulsan Project (Newsletter #10)

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.