Additionality Please!: A Study and Evaluation

download pdf file

An in depth look into measuring additionality from studies in India’s electricity sector and other Chinese and Indian project documents by Barbara Haya at UC Berkeley’s Energy and Resources group.

Some snippets:

“Our inability to accurately measure how much individual projects reduce emissions, compounded by the current and future use of offsetting credits by industrialized countries, risk substantially undermining the effectiveness of the post-2012 climate change regime and our ability to control global greenhouse gas emissions. Any offsetting mechanism included post- 2012 will need to:

  •  include an alternative means for targeting projects and activities that will affect emissions
  • trajectories without testing additionality on a project-by-project basis, a process which is essentially subjective and inaccurate;
  •  be predictable, providing certain benefits to those depending on it; and
  •  be small in the context of deeper Annex 1 targets.

Both the large-scale use of offsetting to meet industrialized country targets and the continuation of project-based offsetting risk undermining the ability of global climate change agreements to control greenhouse gas emissions.”


Related posts

COP28: Article 6 failure avoids a worse outcome 

Torn between countries demanding that Article 6 carbon markets be available with virtually no restrictions and countries insisting on upholding transparency, human rights, and climate ambition, negotiators at COP28 failed to break the deadlock. With all the unresolved problematic issues, the fact that they reached no deal was better than agreeing to a bad one that would torpedo the Paris Agreement.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.