Further Development of the Project-Based Mechanisms in a Post-2012 Regime

download pdf file

While the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) continues to grow rapidly, there are many critics doubting its climate integrity and its contribution to sustainable development. Against this background, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) commissioned the Wuppertal Institute to conduct a study on the further development of the project-based CDM within the future climate regime. The study focuses on how to foster the CDM’s quality in terms of its contribution to sustainable development and technology transfer, as well as quantitative aspects, that is, the environmental integrity of CDM projects. The aim was to develop concrete recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness of the
CDM in qualitative and quantitative terms. The analysis in this project consists of four main parts:

  1. First, an analysis of the “CDM Gold Standard” (GS). The aim of this analysis is to assess the robustness this premium label and determine whether elements of the GS could be adopted for the CDM as a whole.
  2. Second, an analysis of “conventional” CDM projects. The aim of this part is to find further best practice examples of sustainable development benefits and the demonstration of additionality under the conventional CDM.
  3. Third, an analysis of the approval procedures of the host country Designated National Authorities (DNAs). Here as well the intention is to survey the current practice and if possible identify elements that might be suitable to be adopted for the CDM as a whole.
  4. Fourth, the report takes into account the proposals for reforming the CDM that have been tabled in the international negotiations and their current status. This analysis in particular aims at assessing to what extent it would be politically feasible to implement the results derived from the aforementioned analysis under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).  The final chapter presents recommendations on improving the CDM based on the outcomes of the analysis.


Related posts

Carbon Market Watch welcomes EU ban on “carbon neutrality” greenwashing

Companies selling in the European Union will no longer be able to claim that their products are carbon or climate neutral, the EU has provisionally agreed. This victory against greenwashing corresponds to longstanding demands from climate campaigners to eliminate the use of offsets and send a signal to the voluntary carbon market.

Integrity Council’s rulebook sets minimum threshold instead of high bar for carbon markets

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s latest guidelines provide a set of much-needed incremental improvements but fail to raise the quality of carbon credits sufficiently and leave too much wiggle room to truly tackle the climate crisis. The ICVCM has the opportunity to clear up the loopholes and ambiguities when it issues its first assessments of carbon market programmes.

Further Development of the Project-Based Mechanisms in a Post-2012 Regime

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.