Further Development of the Project-Based Mechanisms in a Post-2012 Regime

download pdf file

While the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) continues to grow rapidly, there are many critics doubting its climate integrity and its contribution to sustainable development. Against this background, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) commissioned the Wuppertal Institute to conduct a study on the further development of the project-based CDM within the future climate regime. The study focuses on how to foster the CDM’s quality in terms of its contribution to sustainable development and technology transfer, as well as quantitative aspects, that is, the environmental integrity of CDM projects. The aim was to develop concrete recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness of the
CDM in qualitative and quantitative terms. The analysis in this project consists of four main parts:

  1. First, an analysis of the “CDM Gold Standard” (GS). The aim of this analysis is to assess the robustness this premium label and determine whether elements of the GS could be adopted for the CDM as a whole.
  2. Second, an analysis of “conventional” CDM projects. The aim of this part is to find further best practice examples of sustainable development benefits and the demonstration of additionality under the conventional CDM.
  3. Third, an analysis of the approval procedures of the host country Designated National Authorities (DNAs). Here as well the intention is to survey the current practice and if possible identify elements that might be suitable to be adopted for the CDM as a whole.
  4. Fourth, the report takes into account the proposals for reforming the CDM that have been tabled in the international negotiations and their current status. This analysis in particular aims at assessing to what extent it would be politically feasible to implement the results derived from the aforementioned analysis under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).  The final chapter presents recommendations on improving the CDM based on the outcomes of the analysis.

Author

Related posts

EU’s 2040 credit line risks bankrupting the climate

The inclusion of flawed carbon credits in any compliance or voluntary market – particularly within the EU’s 2040 climate architecture – would pose a serious risk to environmental integrity. If the EU allows these credits to count towards its legally binding climate targets, it will effectively undermine real domestic mitigation by replacing it with credits that exist only on paper.

First wave of Article 6 carbon credits misfire spectacularly

A new Carbon Market Watch analysis, based on currently available project data, has uncovered that the first project transitioning from the CDM to the Article 6.4 market is poised to issue an astonishing 27.4 times more credits than it should as compared to the values from peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.