Search
Close this search box.

Palm trees and bamboos not eligible for A/R CDM project activities (Newsletter #7)

In May 2008, the Board clarified whether the definition of forests within the context of the CDM would include palm trees and bamboos. It decided that the definition may treat palm trees and bamboos in the same way as trees, if DNAs would confirm that in their forest definition. It also decided that the definitions should be uploaded to the website[1]. However, the clarification did not turn out to be clear enough. As a result, the afforestation and reforestation working group recommended a new definition as a response to a clarification request[2] which will be discussed during this meeting.

CDM Watch urges that palm trees and bamboo no to be included in the CDM. This is extremely important as for example palm oil tree plantations result in a substantial decline in carbon stocks. In Indonesia alone, millions of hectares of peatlands have been drained for palm oil and pulp wood. The loss of these carbon rich soils causes ongoing emissions of up to 90 tons CO2 per ha/yr, / 200 mln mton CO2 per year. Ending these plantations and restoring the peatlands is very much needed. Plans to restore carbon-rich natural forest ecosystems would be hindered by including palm trees and bamboo as A/R CDM project activities[3].

Action to be taken by the Board: CDM Watch recommends the adoption recommended by the A/R working group stating that “Until a DNA provides clarification that the definition of forest as reported by them to the Board includes palm (trees) and/or bamboos it shall be deemed that the definition does not include palms (trees) and bamboos;

So far only the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana and India have uploaded their definition of forests to the website.  None of them explicitly states that neither palm trees nor bamboo shall be eligible for A/R CDM project activities. This means that until a DNA uploads a definition that specifically includes bamboos and palm trees, they are not eligible for A/R CDM project activities.


[1] http://cdm.unfccc.int/DNA/cdf/index.html

[2] http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/ARmethodologies/clarifications/85164

[3] Policy brief against CDM support for forest plantations, http://www.wetlands.org/WatchRead/tabid/56/mod/1570/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/2455/Default.aspx

Author

Related posts

Pricing the priceless: Lessons for biodiversity credits from carbon markets

Biodiversity markets are meant to channel private sector funding towards schemes that aim to conserve and restore biodiversity. In its current form, the unregulated funding schemes are reminiscent of the voluntary carbon market, which has a track record of supplying poor quality, cheap credits that inadequately transfer funds to the Global South. 

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.