download pdf file

Not all greenhouse gas emissions reductions are created equal, especially those spewing from hydroelectric projects spurred by the CDM in China.

Law Professor John Copeland Nagle from the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, USA indubitably caught on to this.  He spells out the good and bad consequences of these projects in “Discounting China’s Dams”, also suggesting to move  more resources to establish and run CDM projects to host countries (away from dams) and push for other renewable energy projects instead.   But the big thriller is his proposal to battle the market incentives that continue to subsidise and proliferate harmful hydroelectric projects with a way to “discount” these projects with a multiplication factor that unequivocally awards less credits for every ton of avoided emissions.   This way, the CDM can dodge the most harmful environmental projects, allocate credits to other developing countries, and inch closer to sustainable development.  Let’s see how dam investors will get shaken up on this invigorating proposal.

Author

Related posts

EU’s 2040 credit line risks bankrupting the climate

The inclusion of flawed carbon credits in any compliance or voluntary market – particularly within the EU’s 2040 climate architecture – would pose a serious risk to environmental integrity. If the EU allows these credits to count towards its legally binding climate targets, it will effectively undermine real domestic mitigation by replacing it with credits that exist only on paper.

First wave of Article 6 carbon credits misfire spectacularly

A new Carbon Market Watch analysis, based on currently available project data, has uncovered that the first project transitioning from the CDM to the Article 6.4 market is poised to issue an astonishing 27.4 times more credits than it should as compared to the values from peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.