The Board must resist pressure to re-examine NM0297 (Newsletter #3)

At their last meeting, the EB rejected the new methodology NM0297 which would apply to project activities that reduce emissions in degraded tropical peat whose combustibility has been enhanced by artificial drainage for agriculture or another economic purpose and which is exposed to ongoing fire risk. As referred to in the Board’s annotated draft agenda, CDM Watch understands that the National Council on Climate Change, Indonesia and JP Morgan Climate Care have now requested the EB to re-examine NM0297.

While the mitigation of emissions from peat burning in the tropics is important, CDM Watch warns that this methodology has dangerous potential to create a loophole as it is not possible to prove that the emission reductions from these project activity types are permanent. The project activities may only delay the release of the GHG emissions. Therefore, the methodology was rightly rejected.

Action to be taken by the Board: CDM Watch calls on the Board not to reopen the consideration of NM0297 as requested by the National Council on Climate Change, Indonesia and JP Morgan Climate Care.


Related posts

Carbon Market Watch welcomes EU ban on “carbon neutrality” greenwashing

Companies selling in the European Union will no longer be able to claim that their products are carbon or climate neutral, the EU has provisionally agreed. This victory against greenwashing corresponds to longstanding demands from climate campaigners to eliminate the use of offsets and send a signal to the voluntary carbon market.

Integrity Council’s rulebook sets minimum threshold instead of high bar for carbon markets

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s latest guidelines provide a set of much-needed incremental improvements but fail to raise the quality of carbon credits sufficiently and leave too much wiggle room to truly tackle the climate crisis. The ICVCM has the opportunity to clear up the loopholes and ambiguities when it issues its first assessments of carbon market programmes.

The Board must resist pressure to re-examine NM0297 (Newsletter #3)

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.