Close this search box.

Eyes on The Tiger

Having followed climate politics and in particular the clean development mechanism (CDM) for the first half of this year in the northern hemisphere, I will spend the rest of this “climate” year in a CDM host country to closely look at some CDM projects on the ground. Five years on to the registration of the very first CDM project in 2004, the aim is to check whether the two principles of the CDM – emission reduction and sustainable development – are still valid, or whether the profitable carbon market has made it impossible for host governments to resist lucrative offers of foreign investors and credit buyers of often not so clean and sustainable projects.

Registered project activities by host party: Total 1755For now, my mission will lead me through India which hosts most CDM projects after China. It has a strong and vocal civil society movement and plays a key role in international climate talks. While investigating different project types, I will talk to local communities which are directly affected by the potential positive/negative impacts of several key CDM projects, including municipal solid waste, large hydro, afforestation and HFC projects. The final result of this research will point out the flaws and inefficiencies of the CDM which have to be addressed in the urgent reform of the CDM by the end of this year in Copenhagen, where a post-2012 mechanism will be discussed. Policy makers and delegates must listen to the voices of local communities directly affected by CDM projects.

The CDM has faced serious criticism since the Kyoto Protocol, its legal basis, entered into force in 2005. The scope of this criticism is large, focusing inter alia on the design of methodologies which allow inappropriate technologies to qualify for the mechanism, the principal institutional bodies which constantly face accusations related to conflicts of interests and the project developers and validating institutions where fraud and manipulation is said to be happening on a daily basis.

But most worrying is the consequence of this weak structure. On the basis of modified documents and manipulated data, a huge amount of non additional CDM projects is said to be registered every year. This means that rich nations offset their domestic climate duties with credits that are not reducing any emissions. This consequently allows industry from Europe, Japan and Canada to keep emitting and pay off their national reduction obligations with cheap credits.

The principle philosophy of CDM intends to make up for the benefit for Annex I countries of cheaper emission reductions by contributing to sustainable development in the host country. This could be done for instance by creating job opportunities, deploying new technologies, improving energy access and improving local environmental standards. But the profitable business of CDM projects makes it almost impossible for host countries to decline lucrative offers of foreign investors of often not so clean and sustainable technologies.


Related posts

Pricing the priceless: Lessons for biodiversity credits from carbon markets

Biodiversity markets are meant to channel private sector funding towards schemes that aim to conserve and restore biodiversity. In its current form, the unregulated funding schemes are reminiscent of the voluntary carbon market, which has a track record of supplying poor quality, cheap credits that inadequately transfer funds to the Global South. 

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.