Search
Close this search box.

Recommendations for the efficiency in the operation of the CDM and opportunities for improvement

CDM Watch welcomes the opportunity to provide its views to the CDM Executive Board on strategic improvements in the operation of the CDM as requested by the CMP in its decision 2/CMP.4.

CDM Watch is very concerned about the development of the CDM over the past years and presents these views in light of the CDM’s failure to meet both of its key objectives to support climate change mitigation and sustainable development in developing countries. Highlighting the need to address the poor environmental integrity, little contribution to sustainable development and inequitable geographical distribution of CDM projects, this submission focuses on the following shortcomings:

  1. Poor environmental integrity of CDM projects
  2. Little contribution to sustainable development
  3. Inadequate governance structures of the CDM Executive Board (the Board)
  4. Lack of transparency in decision-making
  5. Poor performance of Designated Operational Entities (DOEs)

These five main points are key premises for an efficient operation of the CDM. Given that the CDM has grown to a multi-billion dollar market, the Board is de facto a market regulator. To take on this role, the Board, with its non-permanent members, needs to move to a truly supervisory committee and delegate decisions on individual cases to a professional support structure. The impartiality of Board members needs to be addressed and immunity of Board members needs to be guaranteed. The current processes with regard to the documentation and justification of decisions need to be improved and access of UNFCCC accredited observers to the Board and the DNA Forum needs to be granted.

Moreover, lessons learnt from the poor performance of DOEs in the past need to be addressed. Most importantly, the poor environmental integrity and the missing contribution to sustainable development need to be brought back on the agenda.

You can download the complete comment as pdf-file:
Recommendations for the efficiency in the operation of the CDM and opportunities for improvement

Author

Related posts

COP28: Article 6 failure avoids a worse outcome 

Torn between countries demanding that Article 6 carbon markets be available with virtually no restrictions and countries insisting on upholding transparency, human rights, and climate ambition, negotiators at COP28 failed to break the deadlock. With all the unresolved problematic issues, the fact that they reached no deal was better than agreeing to a bad one that would torpedo the Paris Agreement.

COP28: Warming up to the challenge of record temperatures

Carbon Market Watch will be at this year’s climate change conference (COP28) in Dubai to demand, along with civil society allies, that major polluters speed up their decarbonisation and turn back the dial on accelerating global heating.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.