Search
Close this search box.

Revision of ACM0002 for renewable power generation (Newsletter #1)

The Methodologies Panel recommends the Board to revise the Methodologies ACM0002 for renewable power generation (paragraph 28 of the Meth Panel meeting report). CDM Watch welcomes this proposal for revision as it broadens the scope of the Methodologies to projects that retrofit existing renewable power plants. In addition and as part of this revision, CDM Watch encourages the Board to revise ACM0002 with regard to another issue: currently ACM0002 allows very large hydro power projects to establish additionality by using a barrier analysis. This is inconsistent with other CDM methodologies that require for large investments in the power sector an investment analysis (e.g. AM0029 for greenfield natural plants and ACM0013 for efficient fossil fuel power plants). CDM Watch believes that the use of a barrier analysis for large hydro power projects is not credible, as this technology is common practice in many developing countries and frequently implemented without the CDM. The additionality of many large hydro power projects has been questioned by many stakeholders (see reports by International Rivers Network). The Board should now address these concerns. An investment analysis is a more suitable approach for this type of project activities. This would also ensure consistency with similar approved methodologies and avoid the use of a rather subjective barrier analysis for a common practice technology.

Action to be taken by the Board: The Board should approve the recommendation by the Methodologies Panel on revision of ACM0002 but should make the investment analysis mandatory for greenfield hydro power projects.

Author

Related posts

Pricing the priceless: Lessons for biodiversity credits from carbon markets

Biodiversity markets are meant to channel private sector funding towards schemes that aim to conserve and restore biodiversity. In its current form, the unregulated funding schemes are reminiscent of the voluntary carbon market, which has a track record of supplying poor quality, cheap credits that inadequately transfer funds to the Global South. 

Going for green: Is the Paris Olympics winning the race against the climate clock?

Aware of the impact of the games on the climate and of record temperatures on the games, organisers of the Paris games have pledged to break records when it comes to reducing the impact of this mega event on the planet. ‘Going for Green’, a Carbon Market Watch and éclaircies report assessing the credibility of these plans reveals that if completely implemented, only 30% of the expected carbon footprint is covered by a robust climate strategy.

Lost in Documentation

Navigating the maze of project documentation

A new report by Carbon Market Watch has raised concerns over a lack of transparency and accountability within the unregulated voluntary carbon market caused by the unavailability of important project documents from the four biggest carbon crediting standards.

Join our mailing list

Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.