Showing all results

Policy Submissions
26 Mar 2013

Submission on Views regarding Human Rights in the Revision of the CDM Modalities and Procedures

This submission is to the UNFCCC on Views regarding Human Rights in the Revision of the CDM Modalities and Procedures. As part of the review of the CDM Modalities and Procedures, the undersigned organizations call on the CDM to: establish institutional safeguards; strengthen local community and civil society participation; and provide processes to ensure that affected communities have a means to raise concerns at any stage of the project cycle.

Policy Submissions
26 Mar 2013

Submission of Views on the Framework for Various Approaches and the New Market Mechanism

This submission is to the UNFCCC on views on matters referred to in paragraphs 48 and 52 of the Doha decision on the Framework for Various Approaches and the New Market Mechanism. Our recommendations are to: Ensure Robust Governance structure, Avoid all Types of Double Counting, Secure net atmospheric benefits, Uphold human rights, and Deliver sustainable development benefits.

Policy Submissions
27 Feb 2013

Submission on Joint Implementation guidelines and revision (CAN-International)

This submission to the UNFCC comes from CAN International and outlines recommendations on on how the joint implementation guidelines and other decisions of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol pertaining to joint implementation should be revised.

Policy Submissions
27 Feb 2013

Submission to call for input: CDM Executive Board 72nd Meeting Agenda

Carbon Market Watch submission to the CDM EB 72nd annotated agenda meeting with recommendations regarding changes to the CDM Moralities and Procedures including: 1) Fundamental reform of additionality requirements, 2) Change length of crediting period, 3) require that no CDM can violate human rights, 4) Improve the CDM contribution to sustainable development, 5) DOE, Accreditation and 6)…

Policy Submissions
15 Nov 2012

Recommendations for AWG-KP18

This paper outlines key issues under discussion at AWG-KP 18. Carbon Market Watch provides recommendations in particular on the following issues: 1) Increasing ambition and closing loopholes, 2) Carry- over of assigned amount units (AAUs), 3) Eligibility issues relating to CP2 and 4) Review of the clean development mechanism (CDM)

Policy Submissions
15 Nov 2012

Recommendations to the CMP8 on the CDM

This paper outlines recommendations on key issues on the discussion at CMP8 on the CDM. Our key recommendations are: Fundamentally reform additionality requirements. Suspend and reform guidelines for standardised baselines Ban CDM coal power projects. Address human rights concerns. Improve the CDM’s contribution to sustainable development. Improve the constitution and conduct of the CDM Executive Board…

Policy Submissions
15 Nov 2012

Recommendations to the SBI-37 on CDM Appeals Procedure

This paper outlines recommendations on discussions on CDM Appeals Procedure.  The SBI will consider the following issues in Doha at its 37th session: The scope of appeal, i.e., whether it can consider appeals of approvals as well as rejections and alterations; The definition of stakeholders, i.e., who has standing to appeal ; The grounds for…

Policy Submissions
11 Nov 2012

Submission to call for input: CDM Executive Board 70th Meeting Agenda

CDM Watch submission to the CDM EB 70th annotated agenda meeting with regard to items on 1) Recommendations to the CDM Policy Dialogue, 2) Standardised Baselines, 3) Nitric Acid Projects, 4) Sustainable Development co-benefits of project activities, including PoAs and 5) Improving Local and Global Stakeholder Consultation  

Policy Submissions
22 Jun 2011

Unsolicited Letter: Clarifying requirements for revision and clarification requests

In its 55th meeting in July 2010, the Board announced to clarify the requirements that stipulate who is allowed to make such submissions (55 EB meeting report, para 26) and requested that the Secretariat to prepare a clarification on this. We were further informed that the discussion on this matter was scheduled to take place at EB58. However, the Board has not yet discussed the issue and the Secretariat informed us that it is of the view that it should wait until the Board provides clear guidance on how to proceed.